Post by droofus on Oct 27, 2010 10:15:17 GMT -5
Found these video battle reports on Black Matt's blog. They're of a game that took place last weekend at the Battle For Salvation Tournament. Before I go any further I should say that I had the honor of playing Black Matt in the 'Ard Boyz semifinals last year. He is a really cool guy and a gifted painter to boot. The guy he's playing is Stelek. WARNING there is copious amounts of profanity involved.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJrBxzwWwhg&feature=player_embedded
www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dYDD891yw4&feature=player_embedded
First, is anyone else extremely bummed about what this games says about the state of the meta-game? It makes me fear for our hobby when I see two nearly identical mech and reserve-based lists playing a stand-off game. Note that in the course of the game maybe a 1/3rd of each army actually comes within 24" of each other (the T-Wolf Squads and the Wolf Scouts). The rest of their armies just sat back at 36" and 48" and shot with lascannon and missile launcher. What's more scary is that these two were paired up because they had beat everyone else they played. There is no denying that such lists are dominant.
The E-geniuses will call this tactical play, and deride orks, nids and other cc-armies mindless CC spam. However, I ask you, is there really THAT much more tactical ability involved with plopping 8 lascannons and 15 missile launchers down on the table? Is there that much more tactical ability to auto-reserving all your vehicles if your opponent happens to get first turn?
Secondly, is anyone else bothered by the fact that the Space Wolves have become THE army for such a conservative play style? I'm not bothered with IG playing like this - that's what they're supposed to do! But I remember the time that wolves were balls to the wall aggressive like orks. But I guess these days space wolves are all long fangs, razorbacks and wolf scouts. They've become IG Wolves. As an aside, kudos to Ross for actually playing 'em like he's got a pair.
Finally, I'm kinda bummed about how they acted towards each other. It's sad when the most interesting part of the game is how the players argued. This game was rife with instances of one guy calling the other out on a rule and the other getting really defensive about it. I also saw at least one instance of selective rules memory (applying a rule zealously to your opponent but ignoring it when it would effect). They tried to play it off like it was all good-natured, but I seriously doubt that. It certainly didn't seem like a fun game.
Anyway, rant over. What do you think about this battle? Is this the future of "competitive" 40k? Two razorspam lists shooting at each other across the table while the two players snipe and bicker? Or am I overreacting?
EDIT: I should also say for any new or prospective players, that this is NOT something that takes place at tripleplay. We are much nicer and our lists are much cooler than this ;D
www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJrBxzwWwhg&feature=player_embedded
www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dYDD891yw4&feature=player_embedded
First, is anyone else extremely bummed about what this games says about the state of the meta-game? It makes me fear for our hobby when I see two nearly identical mech and reserve-based lists playing a stand-off game. Note that in the course of the game maybe a 1/3rd of each army actually comes within 24" of each other (the T-Wolf Squads and the Wolf Scouts). The rest of their armies just sat back at 36" and 48" and shot with lascannon and missile launcher. What's more scary is that these two were paired up because they had beat everyone else they played. There is no denying that such lists are dominant.
The E-geniuses will call this tactical play, and deride orks, nids and other cc-armies mindless CC spam. However, I ask you, is there really THAT much more tactical ability involved with plopping 8 lascannons and 15 missile launchers down on the table? Is there that much more tactical ability to auto-reserving all your vehicles if your opponent happens to get first turn?
Secondly, is anyone else bothered by the fact that the Space Wolves have become THE army for such a conservative play style? I'm not bothered with IG playing like this - that's what they're supposed to do! But I remember the time that wolves were balls to the wall aggressive like orks. But I guess these days space wolves are all long fangs, razorbacks and wolf scouts. They've become IG Wolves. As an aside, kudos to Ross for actually playing 'em like he's got a pair.
Finally, I'm kinda bummed about how they acted towards each other. It's sad when the most interesting part of the game is how the players argued. This game was rife with instances of one guy calling the other out on a rule and the other getting really defensive about it. I also saw at least one instance of selective rules memory (applying a rule zealously to your opponent but ignoring it when it would effect). They tried to play it off like it was all good-natured, but I seriously doubt that. It certainly didn't seem like a fun game.
Anyway, rant over. What do you think about this battle? Is this the future of "competitive" 40k? Two razorspam lists shooting at each other across the table while the two players snipe and bicker? Or am I overreacting?
EDIT: I should also say for any new or prospective players, that this is NOT something that takes place at tripleplay. We are much nicer and our lists are much cooler than this ;D