|
|
Post by droofus on Aug 10, 2012 13:43:27 GMT -5
Just a reminder to all to bring a couple copies of your list as well as any relevant codices. Everyone should also make an effort to bring their 6th ed rulebooks, as I feel that we'll be spending some time looking up rules.
See you all at ten!
|
|
|
|
Post by discordian on Aug 10, 2012 14:46:24 GMT -5
Are headless marines alright?
Everything else is WYSIWYG but apparnelty germany takes longer than two weeks on shipping me custom heads.
If no its not to much of a problem Ill just field my normal stuff instead.
|
|
|
|
Post by jeremyholiday on Aug 10, 2012 18:13:31 GMT -5
don't mind headless marines...
|
|
|
|
Post by droofus on Aug 10, 2012 18:55:51 GMT -5
Are headless marines alright? Everything else is WYSIWYG but apparnelty germany takes longer than two weeks on shipping me custom heads. If no its not to much of a problem Ill just field my normal stuff instead. That's cool. If it comes down to it heads for LOS (for either player), play them like they've got one. Otherwise it can be the Sleepy Hollow Chapter. |
|
|
|
Post by fuzzums on Aug 11, 2012 19:06:55 GMT -5
That was an awesome time guys ^.^ What is Jame's SN? The other Tau player.
|
|
|
|
Post by jeremyholiday on Aug 11, 2012 20:57:53 GMT -5
Don't know if he is on the boards much...
Thanks all for a solid, fun tournament.
|
|
|
|
Post by droofus on Aug 12, 2012 9:42:44 GMT -5
Congrats Jeremy for a well deserved win! And to Damien for racking up 30 victory points and taking second. James (who is also known as Hashmark on the boards) rounded out the prize winners with his ice-blue tau.
|
|
|
|
Post by discordian on Aug 12, 2012 11:58:21 GMT -5
Great game everyone. It was fun playing you Jeremy and Damian even if you did both push me out of the winners circle.  One minor nag. Next time if we're going to keep a odd number of objectives can they be evenly distributed somehow. I know its a part of 6th but I'm not a fan of who ever goes first and gets pick deployment side first then getting to place the higher number of objectives where they want. |
|
|
|
Post by fuzzums on Aug 12, 2012 12:31:27 GMT -5
Thanks for the name Drew  Chris I am pretty sure you place objectives before you choose table sides. Check the book bro. I am pretty sure it says it though because James and I read from the book that you had to place objectives first. However, we were really hot and tired by that point and may have read that wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by discordian on Aug 12, 2012 12:59:51 GMT -5
Oh wow I think we all missed something entirely, or no one told me. There is in fact now a roll off to see which table half you have and then a roll off to determine who deploys and goes first. Terrain and objective setup happens in between.
So you are right you deploy objectives before you find out who goes first. But the person who won deployment half still gets to determine where a majority of the objectives go.
Not as bad as I thought, but still I'd prefer evenly distributed.
edit: look at the bottom of page 118. Skip to the top of 121, then the the second paragraph in the deploy forces section on the same page.
|
|
